
August 23–29, 2026 · Executive Brief
Health Unit Coordinator Recognition Week 2026
Make the communication hub at the center of care visible, reliable, and ready.
A reliable care unit depends on reliable coordination.
The National Association of Health Unit Coordinators recognizes August 23 as Health Unit Coordinator Day and August 23–29 as Health Unit Coordinator Recognition Week. The observance honors professionals whose work helps connect patients, families, clinicians, departments, information, and daily unit operations.
Titles and job designs vary. Health unit coordinators may also be known as unit secretaries, unit clerks, healthcare support associates, health unit assistants, or by other locally defined titles. Their exact scope must follow organizational policy, training, competency, and applicable requirements. What remains consistent is the operational need for accurate information, clear ownership, timely routing, and dependable communication.
NAHUC traces the association’s formation to an August 23, 1980 meeting in Phoenix, Arizona.
NAHUC expanded the annual recognition from one day to the full August 23–29 week.
NAHUC highlights communication, organization, time management, computer proficiency, customer service, critical thinking, and teamwork.
Design the unit as a visible information pathway.
A health unit coordinator often works where multiple streams converge. Leaders should map the route, define who owns each decision, and protect staff from tasks that exceed role, training, policy, or clinical authority.
Receive
Requests, messages, orders, results, calls, arrivals, departures, and service needs enter through defined channels.
Verify
Confirm the patient, source, destination, urgency, completeness, and authorized next step.
Route
Direct information or work to the accountable clinician, department, service, or support function.
Close
Use check-back, acknowledgment, escalation, or documented status so important work does not disappear into a queue.
Learn
Review recurring delays, misroutes, interruptions, duplicate entry, and unclear ownership to improve the system.
Operating principle: the coordinator should not have to compensate for a poorly designed communication system. Standard work, usable technology, role clarity, and escalation support should make safe action easier.
Measure the conditions that make coordination dependable.
Do not reduce the role to call counts or task volume. A useful dashboard connects information movement, unit flow, workload, and system design. Measures should support improvement, not blame individuals for defects they cannot control.
Communication reliability
Track whether high-priority messages reach the right accountable person and receive acknowledgment within the locally defined time standard.
Patient-flow readiness
Identify coordination barriers affecting admissions, transfers, procedures, discharges, transport, environmental services, or bed turnover.
Workload and interruption
Make visible the competing demands that create missed work, rework, fatigue, and reliance on memory.
System usability
Find workflows that require duplicate documentation, manual reconciliation, multiple logins, unofficial notes, or avoidable searching.
Transfer information with ownership, not ambiguity.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality describes a handoff as a standardized transfer of information, authority, and responsibility during transitions in care. The local workflow should make all three visible.
Not every message is a clinical handoff, and a coordinator does not assume clinical authority simply by routing information. Leaders must define which communications the role receives, what verification is required, who accepts responsibility, when escalation occurs, and how completion is documented.
Identify the subject and source
Use approved identifiers. Confirm who is communicating, which patient or operational issue is involved, and whether the channel is appropriate.
Classify urgency without inventing clinical judgment
Apply organization-approved priority rules and escalation criteria. Route clinical interpretation to the qualified clinician responsible for it.
Name the accountable receiver
Send the information to a specific role or person with defined responsibility, not to an unowned inbox, general extension, or informal verbal chain.
Confirm receipt and understanding
Use acknowledgment, check-back, repeat-back, or another approved closed-loop method when the message requires confirmation.
Escalate and document the exception
If the receiver cannot be reached, the response is delayed, or ownership remains unclear, activate the next defined path and record the unresolved state.
Connect recognition to unit reliability.
Review the scorecard with health unit coordinators, nursing, patient access, transport, environmental services, clinical departments, information technology, human resources, and other relevant partners. The work crosses organizational boundaries, so the review should too.
| Domain | Measure | Executive question |
|---|---|---|
| Communication | High-priority messages acknowledged within standard; misroutes; repeat contacts; unresolved escalations | Does important information reach an accountable receiver reliably? |
| Patient flow | Admissions, transfers, procedures, discharges, transport, or bed-turnover delays with a validated coordination cause | Where does unclear status or ownership slow appropriate care? |
| Role clarity | Requests outside approved scope; unclear escalation ownership; policy questions; inconsistent work by unit or shift | Are staff asked to perform work without sufficient authority, training, or guidance? |
| Workforce | Vacancy, turnover, overtime, cross-coverage, schedule stability, orientation completion, and competency support | Is the staffing model resilient across peak demand and planned absences? |
| Technology | Duplicate entry, workarounds, queue age, downtime impact, missing interfaces, ticket resolution, and search burden | Does technology support the workflow, or force staff to bridge its gaps manually? |
| Experience | Psychological safety, recognition, manager access, improvement participation, interruptions, and recurring staff concerns | Can coordinators surface risks and help redesign the system without fear or futility? |
Use the observance to remove one recurring coordination failure.
Recognition matters. It becomes more credible when leaders also listen, measure, and act. Choose one visible defect that staff experience repeatedly, fix it with the people closest to the work, and report the result.
Map the real work
- Name an executive sponsor and operational owner.
- Conduct structured listening sessions across shifts and representative units.
- Map the five highest-volume communication and coordination routes.
- Identify workarounds, unclear ownership, duplicate steps, and out-of-scope requests.
- Select one problem that creates repeated risk, delay, or avoidable burden.
Build the reliable path
- Define the trigger, sender, receiver, urgency rule, acknowledgment, escalation, and closure standard.
- Validate the workflow with frontline coordinators and every receiving department involved.
- Align policy, training, job expectations, technology, and backup coverage.
- Test the process on more than one shift and under peak-demand conditions.
- Remove steps that do not add safety, clarity, compliance, or operational value.
Measure and sustain
- Launch a small dashboard with transparent definitions and ownership.
- Review misses and unresolved work weekly without individual blame.
- Correct training, technology, or staffing barriers revealed by the pilot.
- Share the improvement and recognize the staff who helped design it.
- Assign a recurring review so the new standard does not fade after the observance.
Thank the coordinators. Strengthen the system they hold together.
Health Unit Coordinator Recognition Week honors professionals whose communication, organization, judgment, service, and teamwork support the daily rhythm of care. Leaders can make that recognition durable by creating clear roles, reliable handoffs, usable tools, appropriate staffing, accessible escalation, and a genuine voice in operational improvement.
Turn Health Unit Coordinator Recognition Week into accountable action.
Make the communication hub at the center of care visible, reliable, and ready.
Leadership focus
Use this observance to examine capacity, role design, retention conditions, and operating reliability. Select one verified barrier, assign an accountable owner, and carry the improvement beyond the campaign window.
Workforce lens
Ask whether staffing, role clarity, training, tools, workload, and escalation support the people operating the role, coverage, workload, and escalation pathway.
Patient and community lens
Make the approved first step clear. Test whether a person can move from information to an acknowledged next action without navigating conflicting instructions.
Equity and access lens
Review whether shift, location, employment status, language, disability, or digital access changes who can use the pathway or receive support.
Inspect the operating sequence
Listen with professionals performing the work, operational leaders, and the teams that depend on them. Find one unclear responsibility, hidden workload, or an unsupported handoff, then test the locally approved route from entry through acknowledged follow-through.
- 01Receive
- 02Verify
- 03Route
- 04Close
- 05Learn
Leadership actions for this week
- Name an executive sponsor and frontline operating owner.
- Ask people using and operating the pathway where ownership becomes unclear.
- Test one representative route from first question to acknowledged next step.
- Select one barrier that can be corrected without overstating the evidence.
- Set a review date and define how completion will be verified.
Candidate measures
Define every numerator, denominator where relevant, owner, data source, exclusions, cadence, and limitation locally. These are management prompts, not external benchmarks.
- Unacknowledged messages, repeat calls, misroutes, and escalations by type, shift, unit, and destination
- Delays with a verified coordination cause, using clear attribution rules and timestamps
- Peak request volume, interruption frequency, coverage gaps, overtime, work queue age, and unplanned reassignment
Department readiness checklist
- The public and staff entry points match the actual approved process.
- A specific role accepts each request, referral, or escalation.
- Handoffs include acknowledgment and a visible unresolved state.
- Language, disability, digital, transportation, and trust barriers receive explicit review.
- Communications do not introduce unsupported themes, statistics, or clinical advice.
- A named leader will review what changed after the observance.
Intended audiences
- Executive and Operational Leaders
- Workforce and Human Resources Leaders
Staff communication template
During Health Unit Coordinator Recognition Week, our organization will connect awareness with a practical review of the role, coverage, workload, and escalation pathway. Use approved information, identify the correct entry point, confirm ownership when work moves, protect privacy, and escalate unresolved barriers through local channels.
Community communication template
Health Unit Coordinator Recognition Week is an opportunity to share trustworthy information and make the next step easier to find. Use our approved channels for information and support. If a request changes hands, our goal is to keep ownership and follow-through visible.
Measurement worksheet
- Signal
- What observable condition will show whether the route works?
- Definition
- What is included, excluded, and counted?
- Owner
- Who reviews the signal and acts on exceptions?
- Cadence
- When will leaders review it?
- Equity check
- Which differences require protected, locally appropriate review?
- Closure
- What evidence will confirm the improvement was completed?
Authoritative resources
- National Association of Health Unit Coordinators: Health Unit Coordinator Recognition Week
- National Association of Health Unit Coordinators: Health Unit Coordinator Career
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: TeamSTEPPS 3.0
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Handoff Tool
- O*NET OnLine: Medical Secretaries and Administrative Assistants
Reviewed August 2026. Observance dates and history are from NAHUC. The operating model and measures in this executive brief are original management guidance and should be adapted to the organization’s role definitions, staffing model, technology, policy, training, collective-bargaining obligations where applicable, and local requirements. This article supports leadership planning and education. It does not replace clinical judgment, legal advice, employment guidance, or organizational policy.

